Comparative Assessment of Basel III and Solvency II von Edu Pristine

video locked

Über den Vortrag

Der Vortrag „Comparative Assessment of Basel III and Solvency II“ von Edu Pristine ist Bestandteil des Kurses „Archiv - Operational Risk“. Der Vortrag ist dabei in folgende Kapitel unterteilt:

  • Basel II/III & Solvency II Framework
  • Basel II/III & Solvency II
  • Risk Classification in Basel II/III vs. Solvency II
  • SCR & MCR under Solvency II
  • Diversification Benefits under Basel II/III vs. Solvency II
  • Pillar I differences between Basel II/III & Solvency II
  • Pillar II differences between Basel II/III & Solvency II
  • Scope of Supervision Pillar II
  • Pillar III differences between Basel II/III & Solvency II

Dozent des Vortrages Comparative Assessment of Basel III and Solvency II

 Edu Pristine

Edu Pristine

Trusted by Fortune 500 Companies and 10,000 Students from 40+ countries across the globe, EduPristine is one of the leading International Training providers for Finance Certifications like FRM®, CFA®, PRM®, Business Analytics, HR Analytics, Financial Modeling, Operational Risk Modeling etc. It was founded by industry professionals who have worked in the area of investment banking and private equity in organizations such as Goldman Sachs, Crisil - A Standard & Poors Company, Standard Chartered and Accenture.

EduPristine has conducted corporate training for various leading corporations and colleges like JP Morgan, Bank of America, Ernst & Young, Accenture, HSBC, IIM C, NUS Singapore etc. EduPristine has conducted more than 500,000 man-hours of quality training in finance.
http://www.edupristine.com


Kundenrezensionen

(1)
5,0 von 5 Sternen
5 Sterne
5
4 Sterne
0
3 Sterne
0
2 Sterne
0
1  Stern
0


Auszüge aus dem Begleitmaterial

... which has been further improved under Basel III whereas Solvency II framework governs Insurance companies under EU Insurance directive. Both Basel II/III & Solvency II are based on ...

... Basel III is an extension of Basel II since it introduces more robust norms for capital in form of having higher loss absorbing capacity & buffers (Countercyclical ...

... a 12 month period of stress assumption. It also considers potential MtM differences due to credit downgrades resulting in higher replacement cost and also introduces leverage ...

... in Basel II/III is linked to each risk individually with a separate confidence level for each individual risk. In Insurance under Solvency II, 99.5% confidence interval ...

... importance in Banks since a Bank run can translate into a systemic risk. They are exposed to asset risk due to liquidity changes. Insurance industry ...

... under stress, leverage ratio & overall liquidity management. Core Tier I will increase to 4.5% of RWA by 2015 compared to present requirement of 2%. To overcome pro-cyclicity a countercyclical buffer up to 2.5% is introduced in order to reduce ...

... to ensure a low one year default probability. Incorporates all factors related to underwriting risk. Minimum Capital Requirements (MCR) – Lies between 25% -45% of SCR. Its a threshold below which the supervisor will cancel a insurance company's license. In case of ...

... diversification. Sum of capital requirements across risk classes must be greater than 8%.No diversification benefit considered. CRAR = capital/(credit RWA+ 12.5* market risk capital+12.5*operational risk capital) >=8%. Solvency II considers diversification benefits in asset classes. Where the correlations between different underwriting risks ...

... all major risks. Solvency II has MCR & SCR which is a 2 level approach. In case of Basel III, mainly MCR however introduction of countercyclical buffer results in a 2 level approach. Basel II/III capital ...

... to Basel II/III. In Basel II/III only Level I diversification benefits are there whereas in Solvency II all levels of diversification are there. In Basel II/III, basis of ...

... frameworks have qualitative requirements regarding risk management & supervisory review under Pillar II which can be analyzed based on aspects of internal risk management process, governance, additional ...

... risks for the Banks where projections of all risk parameters & capital requirements are done to assess the risks. For insurance, ...

... risk are assessed whereas in Solvency II all risks are considered. Solvency II refers to technical provisions which are not considered in ...

... Solvency II assessment is towards identifying factors which may threaten solvency of insurer. Solvency II has more ...

... & market mechanisms by providing information. Public disclosures applicable only at management level in Basel II/III whereas it is applicable at all levels in Solvency II. Both banks & insurers must disclosure amounts and ...

... risk policies for credit risk, gross risk exposures, concentration of exposures, market risk capital requirements & operational risk methods must be done under Basel II ...